All proposals will be peer reviewed. The Creative Activities and Research Council will serve as the primary body to review proposals. However, as necessary, discipline or area experts not on the Council will review proposals to ensure thorough and appropriate evaluations. The Office for Research and Graduate Studies will select a panel composed of members whose expertise reflects the creative activities, discipline and/or research areas of the submitted proposals. Each proposal will be reviewed by three panel members who will provide an independent review discussing the strengths and concerns of the proposed activity or project and will rate the proposal as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor. The panel will convene to discuss individual reviews and, as a panel, make one of the following recommendations for funding: High (Fund at Highest Priority), Medium (Fund if money is available), and Low (Not recommending for funding). Reviews and recommendations will be forwarded to the Office for Research and Graduate Studies. Summary reviews will be provided to PIs.
Evaluation Criteria
Research Proposals Creative Activities
The Dean for Research and Graduate Studies in consultation with the Creative Activities and Research Council will make the final selection of projects to be awarded.
| |
---|
Merit - Novelty, originality and innovation
- Conceptual adequacy of the proposed work
- Understanding of the problem or issue to be investigated
- Clarity and delineation of the objectives
- Adequacy of the research, investigative or experimental plan and methodology
| Merit - Novelty, originality and innovation
- Clarity of what is to be achieved
- Adequacy of the methodology or activity
- Impact on cultures and societies
- Potential for regional, national, or international recognition
|
Personnel, Facilities, and Project Mgt - Qualifications of the applicant to conduct the research
- Availability of facility space and equipment
- Soundness of the project management plan
| Personnel, Facilities and Project Mgt - Qualifications of the applicant to engage in the creative activity
- Availability of facility space and equipment
- Soundness of the creative activity management plan
|
Project Relevance Documented evidence that the work aligns with the University mission for research and teaching | Project Relevance Documented evidence that the work aligns with the University's mission for creative activity and teaching |
Leverage - Potential for leveraging the project to gain external funding.
- Identification of potential funding sources.
| Leverage/Recognition Potential for developing external funding opportunities or other external resources (e.g. forums for artistic recognition) applicable to a specific disciplinary area. |