Explore
This Student Code of Conduct is established to set forth the standards of conduct expected of all Southeastern Louisiana University students and to describe the procedures to be followed in cases of alleged violations of the Code.
The purpose of this Code is to ensure a safe and respectful campus community in which students can pursue their academic goals and engage in the intellectual, social, and cultural opportunities offered by the University. This Code is intended to promote individual accountability and responsibility, respect for the rights and dignity of others, and a sense of community conducive to learning, personal growth, and the pursuit of knowledge.
Students at Southeastern Louisiana University are provided a copy of the Student Code of Conduct annually through the University’s website and the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability’s webpage. Students are responsible for reading and abiding by the Student Code of Conduct’s provisions.
The University reserves the right to change the Student Code of Conduct during the academic year. Revised August 13, 2025.
For this Code, the following definitions apply:
The Board of Supervisors of the University of Louisiana System has granted authority to the President of Southeastern Louisiana University to administer day-to-day affairs, including the administration of the Student Code of Conduct.
Authority is further delegated to the Vice President of Student Affairs or their designee, who administers this Code for the University. University Officials are trained faculty/staff members designated by the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability.
A. Jurisdiction of the University
Students at Southeastern Louisiana University are provided a copy of the Student Code of Conduct annually through the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability’s website. Students are responsible for reading and abiding by the Student Code of Conduct’s provisions.
Jurisdiction applies to all university locations, including where the university is extended to distance education, such as study abroad, service trips, experiential learning opportunities, athletics, club sports, and other group travel. travel. Jurisdiction may also be applied to behavior conducted online, via e-mail, or through electronic mediums in cases where the behavior is not protected by freedom of speech and expression. The university does not regularly search for online information, but may take action if such information is brought to the attention of university officials.
Students may be accountable to external authorities and the university for acts that constitute violations of federal, state, or local law. At the discretion of the University, disciplinary proceedings will continue normally regardless of pending administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings arising from the same or other events. The outcomes of disciplinary proceedings will not be subject to challenge on the ground that criminal charges involving the same incident have been dismissed, reduced, or are pending.
When a student is charged by federal, state, or local authorities with a violation of law, the university will not request or agree to special consideration for that individual because of their status as a student if the alleged offense is also the subject of a proceeding before a hearing board under the Student Code of Conduct. However, the University may advise off-campus authorities of the existence of the Student Code of Conduct and how such matters will be handled internally within the University community.
The university will cooperate fully with law enforcement and other agencies in enforcing criminal law on campus and in the conditions imposed by criminal courts to rehabilitate student violators. Individual students and faculty/staff members, acting in their capacities, remain free to interact with governmental representatives as they deem appropriate.
B. Amnesty
The purpose of this amnesty policy is to ensure that students act promptly in emergencies without the additional concern of facing disciplinary consequences, thus safeguarding their health and well-being. The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA) may grant amnesty in certain cases. Students who take reasonable action to prevent, stop, or report violations of the Student Code of Conduct may be protected by amnesty.
C. Conduct Standards and Regulations
Students at Southeastern Louisiana University are expected to conduct themselves as responsible citizens and to respect the rights and dignity of others. Proscribed conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1. Acts of Dishonesty. Acts of dishonesty are any form of fraudulent behavior or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy. Acts of dishonesty include, but are not limited to:
2. Disorderly Conduct. Disorderly conduct disturbs an orderly function or process of the university and/or infringes on the rights of others, including but not limited to:
3. Abusive Conduct. Abusive conduct is any form of harassment, verbal abuse, retaliation, threatening, or intending to cause harm, stalking, or violent behavior, including but not limited to:
Any physical aggressive or violent behavior/act may result in interim suspension (see interim measures). If found responsible, the sanction may result in permanent probation up to expulsion from the University. The University has jurisdiction over all behavioral infractions that occur in university facilities or on university property. University charges and criminal charges are independent of each other.
4. Power-Based Violence or Sexual Misconduct. Power-based violence is any form of interpersonal violence intended to control or intimidate another person by asserting power over the person. Sexual misconduct is sexual harassment, abuse, assault, and/or sex discrimination prohibited by Title IX. Sexual misconduct cases may be adjudicated under general conduct or Title IX procedures based on jurisdiction (see Power-based Violence and Sexual Misconduct Policy).
5. Endangerment. Endangerment is conduct where an individual’s actions or negligence create a substantial risk of putting someone or something in danger. This can include reckless behavior or unsafe practices that jeopardize others’ well-being or safety, including, but not limited to, violations of the Coasting Devices Policy.
6. Drug Violation. Drug violations are the use, possession, manufacturing, distribution, or sale of cannabis, cocaine, narcotics, or other controlled substances (including over-the-counter drugs, prescription drugs, and drug paraphernalia), except as expressly permitted by law.
7. Alcohol Violation. An alcohol violation is the unauthorized or illegal use, possession, manufacturing, distribution, or sale of alcohol; public intoxication; operating a vehicle or other mode of transportation under the influence of alcohol; or any violation of the university’s Alcohol Policy (see the Student Alcohol Policy).
8. Abuse of Property. The abuse of property includes all forms of property abuse, including but not limited to:
9. Trespassing. Trespassing refers to unauthorized presence on, in, or within any university-owned or operated space, including virtual spaces, buildings, and residence halls. It also includes entering or remaining in a facility, office, or residence controlled by another person after being asked to leave.
10. Weapons Violation. Weapons violation is the unlawful possession, display, discharge, use, or sale of weapons; threatening or attempting to inflict a wound, cause injury, or incapacitate with a weapon; and includes, but is not limited to, all firearms, switchblade knives, and non-culinary knives, or dangerous chemicals (RS 14:95.2). A weapon is any object that is specifically designed to inflict harm or damage, or any object used with the intent to cause harm or damage.
11. Explosives Violation. An explosives violation includes the possession, display, discharge, use, or sale of explosives, bombs, incendiary devices, or fireworks (including firecrackers and ammunition), as well as attempts or threats to use such items, except when required for authorized classroom instruction.
12. Abuse of Computers and Other Technology. Abuse of computers and other technology is unauthorized use of electronic or other devices to record audio or video of individuals in areas where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., locker rooms or bathrooms) and is prohibited, especially if the recording may cause injury or distress. Additionally, sending or posting obscene or abusive messages, videos, or images electronically is also prohibited, including violations of the Responsible Computing Policy.
13. Safety Violation. A safety violation is the unauthorized or improper possession, use, or tampering with emergency, fire, public safety, or security equipment, devices, or systems, including but not limited to:
14. Violation of Other Published University Policies, Rules, or Regulations. Violation of Other Published University Policies, Rules, or Regulations refers to violation of a formal guideline or standard established by the university to govern the behavior and activities of students, faculty, staff, and/or other members of the university community. These policies, rules, and regulations are designed to ensure orderly conduct, uphold academic standards, and promote a positive and safe learning environment. They are typically documented in official university handbooks, codes of conduct, or similar publications and can include:
15. Violation of Federal, State, and/or Local Law. Violation of Federal, State, and/or Local Law is violating any local, state, or federal law, including but not limited to:
16. Failure to Comply. Failure to comply is the failure to act in accordance with legitimate directives of authorized university officials, law enforcement, or emergency personnel. This includes but is not limited to:
17. Abuse of the Campus Discipline System. Abuse of the Campus Discipline System refers to a breach of the University Student Code of Conduct wherein a student intentionally manipulates or exploits the disciplinary processes, including but not limited to:
18. Disruption. Disruption is disturbing the peace and good order of the university or surrounding communities, including but not limited to:
19. Hazing. Hazing is strictly prohibited and is defined by Louisiana law (R.S. 14:40.8 – Criminal Hazing), the Stop Campus Hazing Act, and applicable University and University of Louisiana System policies. Individuals and organizations are expected to be familiar with and comply with these standards. For detailed definitions and requirements, refer to the cited laws and institutional policies (i.e., Hazing Policy).
A. Student Rights:
B. Student Responsibilities
As members of the campus community, students have a responsibility to uphold the values and standards of the institution. This includes maintaining academic integrity, respecting the rights and dignity of others, and adhering to all federal, state, and local law and the rules and regulations set forth by the institution.
Students are expected to contribute to a safe and inclusive environment by acting with honesty, being accountable for their actions, engaging in constructive dialogue, stay informed by reading communications from the University, and inform members of their party of University communications. They are also responsible for actively participating in their educational experience, attending classes regularly, meeting deadlines, and seeking help when needed.
Additionally, students should respect campus property, comply with institutional policies, and contribute to the overall well-being of the community.
Filing a Complaint
Complaints of misconduct against a student are found and reported through the appropriate channel online via ReportIt (www.southeastern.edu/reportit). Always call University Police at 985-549-2222 for on-campus emergencies or 911 for off-campus emergencies.
The complaint should include a written explanation of what happened, identification of the person(s) or group impacted by the alleged violation, and identification of the individual or organization alleged to have violated.
Additionally, written complaints should include the following:
Evaluation
The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA) evaluates the written information that it receives to determine whether it constitutes a complaint that is subject to further
processing. If so, OSAA determines whether it can investigate the complaint. OSAA makes this determination with respect to each allegation in the complaint. For example, OSAA must determine whether OSAA has authority or jurisdiction to investigate the complaint; that is, whether the complaint alleges a violation of any of the code OSAA enforces. OSAA must also determine whether the complaint is filed on time.
Generally, a complaint must be filed with OSAA within 45 business days of the date of the alleged discrimination. If the complaint is not filed on time, the complainant should provide the reason for the delay and request a waiver of the 45 business days limit. OSAA will decide whether to grant the waiver.
In addition, OSAA will determine whether the complaint contains enough information about the alleged violation to proceed with an investigation if OSAA needs more information to clarify the complaint. In that case, it will contact the complainant, and the complainant has 14 business days within which to respond to OSAA’s request for information unless the complainant has requested additional time to provide the information.
Some of the reasons for OSAA’s dismissal of a complaint include:
Notice of Charges
Upon receipt of an alleged violation report, the University will conduct a preliminary review to determine whether the report has sufficient information or merit to warrant an investigation. If there is sufficient information, the University will investigate whether a violation of the Student Code of Conduct has occurred, provided the University determines that a violation has occurred based on Clear and Convincing Evidence. In that case, the student will be provided with written notice of the alleged violation, including specific sections of the rules or policies violated and any evidence collected.
Equivalent Rights
The University will grant equal rights to individuals who are complainants or respondents in disciplinary proceedings. This includes offering the same opportunities for both the respondent and the complainant to have others present during proceedings, allowing an unrestricted choice of attorney or non-attorney advocate, and providing simultaneous notification of the institution’s appeal procedures for both parties, if applicable.
Right to Representation
Students accused of violations have the right to be represented by an attorney or a non-attorney advocate at their own expense. This right extends to both the respondent and the complainant. Students will be informed of their rights in writing before scheduling any disciplinary proceedings. Officially recognized student organizations accused of violations are also entitled to representation by an attorney or a non-attorney advocate at their own expense, a right that similarly applies to both the accused organization and the complainant.
Written notification of the name and relationship of an advisor to the complainant or respondent must be submitted to the Hearing Board Advisor at least 48 hours prior to the hearing. Complainants and respondents must keep their representatives informed of communications from the university.
Accommodation Requests
Students may request accommodations during a disciplinary process to ensure that they receive a fair and equitable hearing. These accommodations might include additional time to prepare for hearings, the presence of a support person, or modifications to the format of the proceedings to address specific needs. The University is committed to providing necessary adjustments to support the student’s ability to participate fully in the process while maintaining the integrity and fairness of the disciplinary procedures. Requests for accommodations should be made promptly, allowing the institution adequate time to assess and implement the necessary arrangements.
Evidence
The university is not required to follow formal rules of evidence in disciplinary proceedings. However, the university intends to make a good faith effort to include relevant evidence and exclude evidence that is neither relevant nor probative.
Standard of Evidence
The investigation of alleged violations of the Student Code of Conduct will be conducted using the “Clear and Convincing” standard of evidence. This means that the evidence presented must be highly and substantially more likely to be true than untrue, establishing a firm belief or conviction in the allegations.
If it is concluded that the facts do not support a finding of a violation by Clear and Convincing Evidence, the matter will be closed and the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA) will record the final disposition of the matter as “Closed.” OSAA will send a letter to the complainant. Neither the fact of an investigation nor the lack of finding will be reflected on the involved parties’ official conduct record.
Access to Evidence
Students will be provided reasonable continued access and the ability to obtain copies of documents and conduct records during open cases. Students requesting access to view documents will need to submit a Records Request. To protect the privacy of those involved, records may not be distributed, posted, altered, or made public, this continues after the resolution process is completed.
Presumption of Innocence
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle applied to accused students or organizations, ensuring they are considered innocent until proven otherwise. This presumption remains intact until responsibility is either acknowledged by the accused or formally determined through a hearing process. During this hearing, the university bears the burden of proving every element of the alleged violation to establish the accused’s responsibility.
Maintenance and Access of Disciplinary Records
Confidential conduct records remain on file with the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability for seven years after the incident. In minor cases that do not involve separation from the institution, confidential conduct records may be expunged at the student’s written request one year after graduation from the university.
Open cases awaiting adjudication remain part of the student’s permanent conduct record. Confidential conduct records involving the imposition of sanctions entailing separation from the institution are kept indefinitely.
To request conduct records, visit the “Records Request” portal on the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability’s website. The following addresses confidentiality, access, and third-party records requests:
1. Confidentiality
Southeastern Louisiana University is responsible for protecting students and student organizations’ information, including information pertaining to conduct files as defined by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). This information is strictly confidential and can only be released upon the written consent of the student or the student organization’s current leadership.
2. Access to Records
Students will be provided reasonable continued access and the ability to obtain copies of documents and conduct records during open cases. Students requesting access to view documents will need to submit a Records Request. To protect the privacy of those involved, records may not be distributed, posted, altered, or made public; this continues after the resolution process is completed.
3. Third-Party Records Requests
Students requesting records for third-party access will need to complete a Records Request form. Processing this request may take up to five (5) to seven (7) business days, as all documents must be redacted for identifiable information pertaining to other students.
Privileged documents or internal memorandums that are not intended to serve as evidence may not be included in the disciplinary record. This ensures that only relevant and necessary documents are maintained, streamlining the management and accessibility of the disciplinary records.
Separation of Roles
To ensure that all disciplinary proceedings are carried out free from conflicts of interest, the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability will ensure that individuals (administrative or adjudicative) will not serve in multiple roles during this process. Dual roles shall be considered if any individual carries out more than one of the following roles with respect to any disciplinary proceeding:
(a) Victim Counselor and Victim Advocate
(b) Investigator
(c) Institutional prosecutor
(e) Adjudicator
(f) Appellate Adjudicator
Participation in Proceedings
For the purposes of this Section, “fully participate” includes the ability to make opening and closing statements, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and provide support, guidance, and advice to the alleged respondent or complainant. This Section does not mandate the use of formal rules of evidence in disciplinary proceedings. However, the university will make a good-faith effort to include relevant evidence and exclude evidence that is neither relevant nor probative.
Interim Measures
UL System member institutions shall have the ability to take reasonable interim measures necessary to ensure the physical safety of members of its campus communities during a timely investigation and adjudication of a student disciplinary issue, including but not limited to the ability to make adjustments in student housing arrangements, impose conditions of mutual no contact between the accused student and the alleged victim, temporarily suspend a student, or ban a student from campus. Such reasonable interim measures shall require the following:
(1) Within seventy-two hours of the alleged violation being deemed an immediate threat, written notice of the interim measure explains the institution’s reasons for enacting the measures.
(2) Within seven business days of the written notice as outlined in the above paragraph, unless otherwise waived by the accused student, an interim measure hearing to determine whether there is substantial evidence that the student poses a risk to the physical safety of a member of the campus community and that the interim measure is appropriate to mitigate that risk.
At the hearing, both the accused student and the alleged victim shall have the right to be represented, at the student’s expense, by an attorney or a non-attorney advocate who may fully participate during the hearing. An accused student’s waiver of the right to an interim measure hearing shall not constitute an admission of guilt or a waiver of any additional rights provided for in this section. (see Interim Measures Hearing)
Investigative Report
When the investigation concludes, the Investigator will then issue an investigation report to the Conduct Authority stating the outcome of the investigation within a reasonable timeframe. A copy of the Investigator’s written summary of the investigation will be accessible to both parties.
Disciplinary Conference
A Disciplinary Conference (DC) provides the Respondent with an opportunity to review the investigative report and accept responsibility for the alleged violations. If the Respondent assumes responsibility for all charges, they may sign a Disciplinary Agreement. The Complainant and Respondent will be notified of the outcome. The Complainant may appeal the issued sanctions (see Appeals).
If the Respondent fails to appear for a disciplinary conference, or a Disciplinary Agreement cannot be reached, the case will be scheduled for a hearing at a later date.
Informal Resolution—Conflict Resolution
Conflict resolution is a process designed to address disputes in a constructive and collaborative manner, with the goal of reaching a resolution that all parties can agree upon. The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability may recommend conflict resolution as an appropriate response, particularly for issues that do not involve violations of the Student Code of Conduct. Participation in conflict resolution is voluntary and requires the agreement of all involved parties.
Informal Resolution – Mediation
Mediation is a voluntary process that requires the commitment of all parties involved, typically used for first-time or less serious violations. The aim is to reach a mutually agreed-upon written resolution that addresses the dispute and prevents future occurrences. The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA) has the discretion to refer a complaint to mediation when appropriate, but this process requires the consent of all parties. OSAA will maintain a record of the mediation efforts and any resulting agreements. Importantly, mediation will never be used as the sole institutional response to complaints involving violence. If mediation efforts are unsuccessful, the complaint may be escalated to a hearing.
If the complaint cannot be disposed of by mutual consent, the matter will be referred to an Investigator. The Investigator will gather information for an adjudicator to determine whether a code of conduct violation occurred.
Formal Resolution—Disciplinary Agreement
At the Disciplinary Conference, the Respondent may assume responsibility for all charges, and the student may sign a disciplinary agreement. The Complainant and Respondent will receive simultaneous notification of the disciplinary agreement, and the Complainant may appeal.
Formal Resolution—Disciplinary Hearing Board
In cases that cannot be resolved in a Disciplinary Conference, and in those incidents that rise to the level of suspension up to expulsion from the University or University Housing, the matter will be referred to a Hearing Board. Hearings involving a hearing board are designed for the complainant and respondent to present their accounts of an incident.
Hearing Notice
Notice will be sent to the last local mailing address and/or email address identified on the student’s official records. Notice sent to the last local/mailing address will be considered delivered two business days after the letter has been posted. Notice sent via email is delivered immediately upon sending.
Students are responsible for notifying the University of their current contact information, including physical/mailing/electronic addresses. Address changes must be made through the Office of the Registrar. Failure to notify the University of the current local address, to collect one’s mail from one’s address, and/or to receive or sign for a mailing does not void the fact that a notice was delivered. Hand-delivered notices are delivered on the date they are given to the student.
Following the hearing, the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA) will advise the Respondent in writing of the determination of the sanction(s) imposed, if any. The complainant will also be informed simultaneously of the determination.
Hearing Scheduling Procedures
Generally, a time set for a hearing will be at least 10 business days after the student has been notified of the hearing. Due to the nature of the academic year, if the incident occurs close to the end of a semester, or if the appropriate hearing board cannot be scheduled, the student’s case will be heard as soon as a hearing can be scheduled. The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability decides when to cancel, reschedule, postpone, or move the hearing location. Maximum time limits for scheduling hearings may be extended at the discretion of the University. The University may make reasonable efforts with parties to schedule a date and time for the hearing; however, once a hearing is scheduled, the University reserves the right to continue with the scheduled hearing date, time, and location.
Hearing Privacy
All hearings are closed. A closed hearing is a proceeding closed to the public to protect sensitive information or the identities of those involved. Admission of any person to the hearing will be at the discretion of the Hearing Board Advisor.
The use of audio, camera, and video recording devices by participants in a hearing is strictly prohibited. The Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability will retain an audio or video recording of the hearing proceedings for the record. Failure to comply with these rules may result in the removal from proceedings and may incur additional disciplinary action(s).
Interim Measures Hearing
When a student or student organization is subjected to an interim action through the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability, they will receive a written notice stating the reasons for the interim action and the time and place of the hearing.
At the hearing, the university will show reasonable cause why the interim action is warranted, and the respondent will have the opportunity to show why the interim action is not warranted. The student may present any information to the board that they deem relevant, including the name(s) of witnesses provided by both the respondent and complainant.
The university personnel conducting the interim measure review may consist of the Director and at least two other representatives from offices such as, but not limited to, Counseling Services, Student Accessibility Services, members of the Southeastern Threat Assessment and Response Team (START), and members of the Hearing Board.
After meeting with the respondent and complainant, reviewing all pertinent information, and interviewing witnesses, the respondent and complainant will be notified of the board’s decision to take one of the following actions:
Notice of the outcome of the interim action will be sent to the respondent and complainant within ten (10) business days.
Who May Appeal
The Respondent and/or Complainant may appeal an adjudicator’s decision based on the ground for appeal outlined within this code. The party filing an appeal will be identified as the appellant. Failure to appeal or comply with the appeal procedures may result in the original decision being final and conclusive. Submitting an appeal of a Hearing Board’s decision involves completing and submitting a conduct appeal via the “Conduct Appeal” portal. Appeals may be denied if they do not meet the criteria outlined in section “Grounds for Appeal”, are not submitted within the specified time frame, or if multiple conflicting submissions are received by the appellate.
In academic misconduct cases, it is important to note that an appeal of student conduct decision/finding pursuant to the Student Code of Conduct appeal process is distinct from an academic/grade grievance. See Academic Integrity Policy.
Grounds for Appeal
Except as required to explain the basis of new information, an appeal at the university level may be limited to a review of the written statement by the party requesting the appeal and/or written documents pertaining to the case. The scope of review shall be limited to consideration of the following questions:
Time for Filing an Appeal
Appeals to the appellate, Vice President for Student Affairs and/or their designee, or President or their designee, must be submitted within ten (10) business days from the draft date of the outcome letter.
Appeals to the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System must be made within 30 calendar days of the President’s or their designee’s decision.
Status During Appeal
It is important for students and student organizations who file an appeal at the university level to understand that the imposed sanction(s) from the hearing outcome are in effect until further notice. The rendered sanction is in effect as of the date identified on the sanction letter or until an appeal is granted. The Vice President for Student Affairs or their designee may choose to temporarily suspend the outcome of a hearing while the appeal is being reviewed.
Appeal Response
While no fixed deadline is prescribed, the institution will endeavor to issue a response in a timely manner. The timeframe for response may be extended at the discretion of the President or designee and/or the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee, as appropriate to the circumstances.
Upheld Appeals
If an appeal is upheld in cases involving appeals by students who have been found to have breached the Student Code of Conduct, the President, Vice President for Student Affairs, or their designee may either:
Appeal to the University President
A student may appeal the decision of the Vice President for Student Affairs to the President of the University or designee if the sanction is one of suspension from the University for one academic year or if the sanction is of greater severity.
For appeals regarding less severe sanctions, the final appeal shall be at the Vice President for Student Affairs level.
Appeal to the University of Louisiana Board of Supervisors
A student may appeal the decision of the University President to the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System if the sanction is one of suspension from the University for one academic year or if the sanction is of greater severity. For appeals regarding less severe sanctions, the final appeal shall be at the University level. If the student chooses to appeal to the Board of Supervisors after all administrative procedures have been exhausted at the University level, the appeal must be submitted to the President of the University of Louisiana System, which refers the appeal to the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System. The appeal must be made within 30 calendar days of the University’s decision. The Board’s review is limited to determining compliance with established and appropriate procedures at the University level. The student shall be notified of the Board’s decision through electronic means or written correspondence.
It is the responsibility of the student to complete sanctions within the required time. A student may upload and submit all completed sanction documentation to the “Sanction Submission” portal on the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability’s (OSAA) website.
Failure to complete sanctions may result in an official “hold” on a student’s conduct records and/or further charges. In the event of non-compliance with an order of suspension or dismissal, University Police will ensure enforcement.
When a hearing board determines that a student has violated the Student Code of Conduct, it may recommend a level of sanctions to OSAA (see the Typical Range or Level of Sanctions section for details). However, OSAA is not bound by the hearing board’s recommendations and may modify the suggested sanctions. The final decision on sanctions will be determined and imposed by OSAA.
Factors that Influence the Degree and Nature of the Sanctions
Sanctions will be issued to respondents found violating some or all of their charges. While some violations have typical outcomes, the Student Code of Conduct seeks to preserve flexibility in the assignment of sanctions so that each respondent is afforded appropriate and just treatment. All sanctioning will consider the institution’s goal of providing an effective learning environment for all members and seek to repair the harm that the incident may have caused.
Factors that may influence the degree and nature of the sanctions include, but are not limited to:
Typical Range or Level of Sanctions
Sanctions are educational consequences given to students when they violate rules or policies, and they vary in severity depending on the nature of the misconduct.
The typical range or level of sanctioning refers to the spectrum of penalties, consequences, or corrective measures that may be applied for a particular offense or violation.
Any student found responsible for aggressive behavior/act may result in permanent probation up to expulsion from the University. The University has jurisdiction over all behavioral infractions that occur in university facilities or on university property. University charges and criminal charges are independent of each other.
Sanctions
The following sanctions, individually or in combination, may be imposed upon any student or student group/organization found to have violated the Student Code of Conduct. This list is neither exhaustive nor in order of severity and may be expanded upon or modified to meet any situation’s circumstances.
Disciplinary Holds
To release a student disciplinary hold on their account and register for courses, a student should contact the office responsible for student conduct or discipline. This usually involves communicating with a representative to discuss the reasons for the hold, fulfilling any required actions or sanctions, and demonstrating that they have addressed the issues that led to the disciplinary action. Once all requirements are satisfied, the office can lift the hold, allowing the student to proceed with course registration.
Transcript Notations
In severe cases of misconduct, a student may be suspended or expelled. System universities shall note such on the student’s academic transcript as follows:
Notation of disciplinary action on academic transcripts may or may not affect eligibility to enroll at other higher education institutions.
Southeastern Louisiana University recognizes that mental health is an important aspect of student health and wellness. The university is committed to promoting a supportive and inclusive environment that encourages students to seek help when needed. Any student experiencing a mental health emergency on campus should immediately contact the University Police Department at 985-549-2222 or dial 911.
Behavioral Intervention Team (BIT)
BIT will assist in helping keep the university community safe and connect distressed students to available support services. BIT’s primary goal is to act preventively versus reactively to students in distress.
The BIT is divided into two categories of intervention, the Southeastern Threat and Response Team (START) and the Lion Intervention Network (LINK).
START
The purpose of the team is to assess and respond quickly and effectively (with input from pertinent professionals on the team) to reports of students who present behaviors that are potentially or actually harmful to themselves or to others or who are disruptive to the teaching and learning process, whether or not these behaviors are psychologically/medically based. The team functions as a communications and information-sharing network that assesses and responds to students in crisis in or out of the classroom. Additionally, the team meets regularly to discuss and plan appropriate responses to potential students’ psychological/mental health and behavioral issues.
LINK
Developed to identify students facing academic challenges and/or personal hardship (i.e., financial, homelessness/displacement, loss of loved one, car accidents, non-life-threatening behaviors, etc.) that hinder their academics. LINK can connect students with any extra help they need along their educational paths to success. LINK functions as a communications and information-sharing network that assesses and responds to students as a pre-crisis intervention in or out of the classroom. Additionally, LINK is monitored daily by the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability (OSAA). OSAA meets regularly to discuss and plan appropriate responses to potential student academic challenges and/or personal hardships. Cases reported to LINK that rise to the level of moderate or extreme are reported to START.
Involuntary Withdrawal
Southeastern Louisiana University is committed to offering an educational opportunity to all students. In certain situations, university officials may become aware of a student who presents a direct threat to the health or safety of others or poses an actual risk to their own safety. When a student’s behavior constitutes a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the student, others, or property, or is disruptive to the educational process of the university, the university may determine that it is necessary for the student to be involuntarily withdrawn from the university. Such withdrawal should follow the procedures prescribed herein.
Involuntary withdrawal will be undertaken when the student exhibits behaviors that include but are not limited to:
The student will be summoned in writing to attend a conference with the Dean of Students or designee. The notice will include the following:
The purposes of the conference with the Dean of Students or designee are:
The student will be afforded the following rights when a hearing is requested before the Committee on Involuntary Withdrawal:
If a hearing is requested before the Committee on Involuntary Withdrawal, a hearing may be arranged within ten (10) business days. The committee will determine by the substantial weight of the evidence, including but not limited to:
Upon determination that involuntary withdrawal is necessary and, in turn, carried out, the conditions for readmission will be specified and submitted for review by appropriate university professional staff and/or consultants and may include, but are not limited to:
A student may be removed immediately from university property as provided in Article VIII of the University Student Code of Conduct pending initiation of the above procedures.
Any questions of interpretation regarding the Student Code of Conduct will be referred to the Vice President for Student Affairs, the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability, or their designee for final determination. The university reserves the right to change the Student Code of Conduct during the academic year. The Student Code of Conduct will be reviewed periodically under the direction of the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee. The most current copy of the Student Code of Conduct can be found on the Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability’s website.
Know the Code is an awareness campaign with the goal of educating the campus community about the Student Code of Conduct and University Policies.
Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the Student Code of Conduct, act in a manner which supports the educational mission of the University, and comply with all University rules.
Refer to the Code of Conduct portal below for the most updated standards, rules and regulations.
Student Advocacy & Accountability enhances the overall educational experience for students by embracing and promoting student learning and development through conduct standards.